Legal matters provide an
excellent opportunity for policy changes Ex. post facto (out of the
aftermath). They also serve as
precedents in the Judiciary. The
Legislator can analyze matters and create "decrees" by which is
proceeded by three readings resulting in a royal decree. This occurs because the legislator does legal
analysis of the case in question while also conducting legal research (Canlii,
2014). From whence complete, legal
planning then takes place. In policy,
governments perform contingency planning wherein they use strategy and tactics
to guide the society as per the rule of law.
They use the process of procedural justice to operate. Procedural justice means that, equity is
gained from the process of the rule of law and in that fairness is the result
(Canliii, 2014). A decree is a legal
proclamation essentially a power delegated from her majesty or his majesty the
Royal line. Within the modern context
however, the role of the Monarch in Canada has been reduced to a figure
head. This means that the Prime Minister
and the Governor General assume a large amount of power and authority against
the Monarch who rules from abroad. In
the Judiciary, the Judge hands down judicial decrees resulting from rational
decision making. Rational choice says
that decisions are a result from perceived pleasure in something (Sens. 2005).
Clearly with the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of the
government, people within it are operating under a bureaucracy. Allen Sens says that there is a pulling and
hauling when it comes to bureaucracy.
This means that decision makers are negotiating (2005).
In the Legislator however, royal decrees as per above are actioned
through the process of royal assent. In
the Westminster model, legislation goes through a deliberation and scrutiny
prior to its presentation to the Monarch.
Specifically in Canada, “bills can be passed through either the House of
Commons or the Senate…. From the House
where [the process is started] …., parliamentarians debate the idea behind the
bill. Once the bill passes the third reading or debate, it passes to the other
house, where it goes through the same stages and it becomes law once it has
been given to the Governor General for royal assent” (The Center for
Constitutional Studies, 2017). In the
Executive, the Prime Minister can only issue decrees in areas that are
permitted by the Constitution. With all
this mentioned, it becomes clear that the authority and power of issuing a
decree becomes increasingly alluring to legal professionals and advocacy
firms. A public decree is a “power,” and
not an “authority.” This means that
citizens must use social mobilization and social movements to gain “power,” in
a bid to gain authority in the domestic environment. A citizen can issue a public decree when
the institutions of the government have failed.
The issuance of public decrees happens through the process of
determination as the citizen or firm attempts to negotiate and bargain. Public decrees start by informing the
opposition that they have failed them.
For example, this can manifest through such documents as a
Condemnation. A Condemnation is
essentially a document that informs the opposition that they have been
committing a wrong of some sort. The document
is provided on the basis of pacta sunt servanda- “agreements must be kept; or agreements are legally binding” (Writing Law 2023); in this case the
Constitution.
Public decrees occur
through a legal maxim, salus populi est suprema lex or suprema lex salus
populi- The welfare of the people is the supreme law. In other words, it means
public welfare is the highest law (Writing Law, 2023). Public decrees have an objective of assentio
mentium – The meeting of minds (Writing Law, 2023). In the process of determination, individuals
and firms practice jus in rem – Right against the world at large through jus
naturale- natural law- (Writing Law, 2023). Or in other words, a system of law
based on fundamental ideas of right and wrong that is natural law, and such
decrees are provided on the basis that the person is bona fide (good faith) so
as long as it is du jur (by law) per the rule of law. When the individual has gone through society
and the institutions of the government and those have failed, they seek to
change the legislations so as to create salus populi suprema lex. A public decree hence is also when the terms
and conditions of the Constitution are not met by the government then a public
decree can be considered bearing the individual has proof of the injustice or
intent. Oftentimes people in politics
are strategically and tactically targeted.
This means that the individual can experience various scenarios. Whatever the scenario, the individual makes
use of it either through democracy and or polity. Individuals that are in a ripe situation for
democracy have amassed large public support.
This means that the individual can create a social movement which
results in social mobilization. While
people that have not amassed public support can take advantage of polity. Meaning that the individual creates authority
through the existing legislation to gain authority at which point can possibly
result in power. These people can
socially mobilize at which point they attempt to access democracy to create
social movement.
The formal process for public decrees is to first, create a petition. With the petition, signatures are amassed. The signatures reflect the democratic support that the specific public decree has. When the petition and the signatures are gathered, it is presented to a legislator who then drafts a bill. The bill then goes through Parliament. Petitions can be published socially on platforms such as Change.org which prides itself for having victories daily or they can be published on newspapers, prints, etc. Usually, the individual has to canvas the society to gain support which means that a certain degree of legal communication is required. This could involve going to events, going through neighborhoods, cold calling etc. This is part of legal analysis, legal research and legal planning but it is also part of interest articulation, interest aggregation, policy creation and policy implementation (Powel et al., 2012). Public decrees are henceforth a legal and political process. Even before these processes, the Scientific Method is used to gather empirical data on the subject matter that is being proposed for change. Facts, proofs and evidence are collected at this stage. Therefore, the issuing of public decrees is actually a pretty robust and comprehensive process designed to serve the rights and interest of the population at large. Lastly, public decrees can also be a form of Engineering if it falls under its standards. This means that the individual or firm must do the following three things before it is considered, “engineering,” 1. Any of various particular intellectual activities or combinations 2. The application of engineering principles, and 3. Safeguarding societal interests (Engineers Canada 2023). With all this in mind, the issuance of public decrees becomes a power of the citizen against a government that may or may not be looking out for that person or firms best interest. Public decrees can be a valuable tool that Citizens, Lawyers, Politicians, Scientist and Engineers can all use to create effective changes in society. Using the public decree process means that the individual or firm is in a process of determination. This means that the individual and or the firm has a different vision than that of the government. In business, vision is differentiated from mission in that, vision is short term while missions are long term. What is interesting to note however is that the government always has a mandate. This means that it is erected for a specific purpose, which is to serve its people per the Treaty of Westphalia and the Constitution thereafter.
WORK CITED
Dickovick, et al. (2016). Comparative Politics. New York. Oxford Publication.
Engineers Canada. (2023). Public guideline on the practice of engineering in Canada. Retrieved from: https://engineerscanada.ca/public-guideline-on-the-practice-of-engineering-in-canada#-characteristics-of-professions
NSLegislature. (2023).
Enforcement of Canadian Judgements and Decrees Act. Retrieved from: Enforcement of Canadian Judgments and Decrees
Act (nslegislature.ca)
Powell, et al. (2012).
Comparative Politics Today.
Illinois, USA. Pearson.
Sens et al. (2005). Global
Politics. Toronto. Thompson Nelson.
Writing Law.
(2023). Top 138 Legal Maxims for
CLAT and Judiciary. Retrieved from: Top 138 Legal Maxims With Meaning for CLAT
and Judiciary (2023) (writinglaw.com)
The Center for
Constitutional Studies. (2017). The Powers of the Prime Minister. Retrieved from: The Center for Constitutional Studies
Zariski, A. (2014).
Uncertainty and Indeterminacy in Law.
Canlii. Retrieved from:
https://www.canlii.org/en/commentary/doc/2014CanLIIDocs355#!fragment/zoupio-_Tocpdf_bk_7/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4BUBTADwBdoAvbRABwEtsBaAfX2zhoBMAzZgI1TMA7AEoANMmylCEAIqJCuAJ7QA5KrERCYXAnmKV6zdt0gAynlIAhFQCUAogBl7ANQCCAOQDC9saTB80KTsIiJAA
No comments:
Post a Comment